IF YOU THINK YOU SELL CARS OVER THE INTERNET, THINK AGAIN!
By: Keith E. Whann
Whann & Associates, LLC
One of the hottest topics in the motor vehicle industry is a
motor vehicle dealer selling vehicles over the Internet. Various
publications even give awards for it. While dealers are certainly
using the Internet more in their day-to-day dealership operations,
what is actually occurring online warrants a closer look. I recently
had the opportunity to participate as a panelist on an Information
Technology Panel along with Representatives from AutoTrader.com,
E Bay Motors and Cars.com. The questions from the dealers in attendance
demonstrated the widespread confusion that surrounds Internet use
by a dealership. My fellow panelists had a variety of ideas and
helpful strategies regarding the Internet; occasionally even differing
in their positions on an issue. The entire panel spoke with a unanimous
voice, however, on one subject: Dealers do not sell vehicles over
the Internet.
Whenever we talk about the activity of a motor vehicle
dealership, it is important to remember that motor vehicle dealerships
and their salespeople are licensed
under State Laws. Virtually every State Motor Vehicle Code prohibits motor
vehicle dealers from selling, displaying or offering for sale motor vehicles
at any place other than a licensed location. Dealers are also generally prohibited
from paying commission or compensation to any person other than a licensed
salesperson employed by the dealership.
Beyond motor vehicle dealer licensing
issues, the paperwork involved in the transaction raises a whole
host of other issues. Although the “E-Signature”
provisions in the Electronic Signature in Global and National Commerce
Act (ESIGN) became effective on October 1, 2000 making it possible
to sign agreements
with digital signatures or electronic codes that have the same legal effect
as an ink on paper signature, motor vehicle dealerships are not able to
provide all of the documentation to complete a motor vehicle transaction
electronically.
Where and when the documents are signed, and in
some cases where the vehicle is delivered, can have a significant
impact on the law governing the transaction
and has been the subject of ongoing dispute. Most State Unfair and Deceptive
Acts and Practices (UDAP) Statutes also require that all material statements
made to a customer and any agreements of the parties be reduced to writing
and integrated into a written purchase agreement signed by both the purchaser
and seller. Similarly, State Retail Installment Sales Acts mandate that
every written installment contract evidencing the retail sale of a motor
vehicle
contain all material statements, terms and conditions of the transaction.
Consumers must be provided with a full, itemized list of costs involved
in the transaction;
terms of delivery and payment; information about restrictions, limitations
or conditions of the purchase; warranties and guarantees; cancellation
or refund polices; and whether after-sale service is available, not to
mention
including
all State and Federally mandated disclosures. In the typical motor vehicle
transaction, a motor vehicle dealership uses in excess of a dozen separate
documents to complete a sales transaction.
Federal Agencies, as well as
State Regulators, have made it clear that their Rules and Regulations
apply to Internet transactions. The Federal
Trade Commission
(FTC), for instance, enforces 46 Federal Laws, many of which apply
to the motor vehicle industry and were developed long before “dot
com” became
a household
phrase. The FTC has declared that its Rules and Regulations cover Internet
advertising, marketing and sales and it has become very active and
aggressive in taking enforcement action against companies conducting
business via
the Internet.
Some Laws enforced by the FTC, such as the Federal Truth
in Lending and Leasing Acts, establish mandatory disclosure requirements
for advertisers
of credit
terms. The Acts are similar in nature to the extent that they list
certain
“triggering terms” which create an obligation on the advertiser to
make additional mandated disclosures in the advertisement. The disclosures
are designed to
insure that consumers are provided with sufficient information to
make an informed decision when weighing the options of obtaining
an item
by
cash,
credit or
through a leasing arrangement. Similarly, if a dealership advertises
that a motor vehicle is sold with a warranty or other form of guarantee,
the
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and Pre-Sale Availability of Warranties
Rule mandate that the
dealership clearly disclose any conditions or limitations on the
guarantee or warranty and make copies of any warranties available
to consumers
before the sale.
Other Laws, like the FTC Act, are broader and prohibit
any “unfair or deceptive acts or practices,” much like State
UDAP Statutes. Pursuant
to both the
FTC Act and State Advertising Laws, for instance, all material
limitations and/or
exclusions must be disclosed in clear and conspicuous language
that is
in close proximity to the offer. In addition, material disclosures
should be
easily
legible, leave no reasonable probability of being misunderstood
or create an erroneous impression concerning any aspect of the
transaction.
A fine-print
disclosure or disclaimer buried in the body of text or on a separate
page on
a website are not likely to be effective. An advertisement is also
likely to be considered misleading if relevant information is left
out or if
it implies
something that is not true.
Besides advertising and marketing the
availability of motor vehicles online, perhaps the next most
popular use of the Internet among
motor vehicle dealers
is to attempt to determine the creditworthiness of potential
customers. The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) permits dealers
to obtain
credit applications via the Internet, provided that there is
a permissible
purpose to do so
or
the dealership has express permission from the consumer. Although
there are a number of permissible purposes listed under the FCRA,
generally
speaking, the three purposes that apply when a consumer is financing
the purchase
of
a motor vehicle include: Whenever the consumer gives permission
in writing; whenever credit is extended in response to an application
for credit
submitted by the consumer; and when there is a legitimate business
need in connection
with a business transaction that is initiated by the consumer.
The
first two purposes are self-explanatory. If a dealership or financing
source
has the
consumer’s written permission to obtain a credit report, or if
the consumer has executed an application for the extension of
credit, the user has
complied with the FCRA. The third purpose is more complicated
because the user must
determine whether it has a “legitimate business need” and whether
the consumer has “initiated” the transaction. In 1998, the FTC
opined
on
this issue
and stated that a consumer merely asking questions about vehicle
availability or a price is not necessarily indicating intent
to purchase a vehicle
from that
particular dealership. Accordingly, if the consumer were simply
comparison-shopping or inquiring about a vehicle online, the
dealership would have to
obtain express permission from the consumer prior to obtaining
a credit report.
The Federal Privacy Laws have added to the challenges
motor vehicle dealers face. The Internet provides unprecedented
opportunities
for the collection
and sharing of information from and about consumers and many
have reported having strong concerns about the security and
confidentiality of their
personal information when engaging in online transactions.
The FTC strongly encourages
companies to implement four fair information practices: Giving
consumers notice of a website’s information practices; offering
consumers a
choice as to how
their personally identifying information is used; providing
consumers with access to the information collected about them;
and ensuring
the security
of the information collected. Motor vehicle dealers across
the country use websites
to collect information about customers and fail to disclose
that fact in their privacy notices. In many cases, dealers have
also
neglected to implement
appropriate
procedures for providing the Privacy Notices themselves or
for safeguarding the information collected as required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act
and the FTC’s Privacy and Safeguards Rules.
Dealers may also
attempt to accept vehicle deposits online. Under State UDAP Statutes,
anytime a deposit or partial payment
is
accepted by
a dealership in connection with a consumer transaction, the
dealership is generally
obligated
to provide a description of the goods and a statement as
to whether the
deposit is refundable and under what conditions. In some
States, even more detailed
information is required, such as the cash selling price of
the vehicle, the amount of allowance on any trade-in, the
time during
which the
option to
complete the transaction is binding, and any additional costs
that may be imposed on
the consumer, such as delivery charges.
Many dealers begin
engaging in e-commerce activity without an understanding of the
potential legal and regulatory ramifications
that exist.
They have constructed websites focusing on their design
and how
quickly
they operate,
without considering
how the screens will look if Federal and State Regulators
review them. Additionally, these websites are often being
constructed
by individuals
who are unfamiliar
with the numerous and very specific laws that impact a
motor vehicle transaction. Remember, while technology allows a
motor vehicle
dealership to take an
order and accept a deposit to hold a vehicle online, use
of the Internet to actually
sell a vehicle stops there! Whether you are currently conducting
business over the Internet, or are contemplating doing
so, it would be wise
to spend some
time to think through the issues raised herein. Unfortunately,
many dealers are finding out that their dealership’s website
is just like
their paperwork
- If the dealership doesn’t review it, a consumer attorney
or regulator will.
The information contained herein has been provided by Keith E.
Whann of the Law Firm of Whann Associates, LLC, and is for general
information purposes only. You should contact legal counsel for
specific application. |